finance How tech could make finsance more equally designed for
all peoples was the main focus of The Economist's next 40 years though the logo invited readers to quiz which empire
cultures/faiths/civil legislatures were built on hate or love we color code red as leaps devaluing
livesmatter, bluegreen as advancing lives matter americas invention of credit cards as25+% loan
sharks replacing bank staff who encouraged savings americas ending of community banks
replaced by nationwide tech of big get bigger 2g mobile cashless banking first
tested probably by mo ibrahim cellnet and vodaphone- converged around bkash- see bill gates review subprime 4g jack ma partners including jerry yang out of stanford and masa son -japan's richest tech guy at softbank
-direct mobile to mobile digital payments and allocation of smart loans to villade and sme supply chain outcomes
of blockhchain and first digital central bank supported curreny partnerships still to be seen- fintech maps here with special
reporting from hong kong are one way to search what's next- nb shenzens main new tech bank comes from china'sleader in insurance;
shenzen's main peoples bank comes from tencent | loveq ultimately true hippocratic professions are designed
round do no harm whereas the golden rule religions go further - love thy neighbor as thysel- and arguable oriental consciousness
movements go deeper implying you represent you family tree's honor in tapping into nature while aiming to make the world better
for other humans you connect with- professions that monetise have nothing to do with livesmatter and when they demand public
servants design laws around big money these professions need to bechased out of any society that craes for its childens future | EDUCATION
we have debated since our 1984 book the 2025 report that how education replaced advertising as the smartest coominication
focus would likely explain whther man took to many exponential risks to survive nature's evolutioary rules- nothing excites
me more in 37 years of searching than experiments that scale in transforig livelihood education- please note the ideolgy of
education determing whether we peoples would humanise ai goes back to gh wells- civilisation is -our 1986 survey in the economist
replayed adam smiths main analysis on how the english language edu system empired all over the world had less than zero to
do with valuing all youth lives matter - a nation has no chance of being great in the 21st century unless there is widespread
commitment to wells valuation of changing education | HEALTH we sougth of assume that health is what every human values
but our 1984 survey in the economist went further - tech will fail wherever it misses opportunities to make basic life saving
health services everyone's access and indedd apps. research shows that there is no point in themost brilliant pharmacist or
surgeon in the world unless societies celebtare front line service workers- florence nightingale was a more important gravity
to valuing health services than powerful american decision makers have ever leart to map | SAFETY may seem from the
world wars to be a top down market to rule over- when communications moved at speed of horse safety did need armies that follower
orders- but this has nothing to do with the biggestvrisks nature has always tested humans and otherliving sysemswith- bottom-up
safety operations distributed nd trusted to build resilient communities are now known to be integral wherever best work of
the united nationsprogreses |